User talk:Vienna1027

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome

Hello, Vienna1027, and

biographies of living people
must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the

helpme
}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page
. Again, welcome!  Drmies (talk) 03:50, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Articles for creation

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation
if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jamesx12345 (talk) 22:21, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to have mixed up the American Revolutionary War with the American Civil War. BD2412 T 17:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in coronavirus disease 2019 (

page-specific restrictions
, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the
guidance on these sanctions
. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

talk) 04:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

January 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an

Misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic‎; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus
, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's

talk) 17:57, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • When you make changes to an article and they are reverted, you should start a discussion on the talk page and seek a consensus for them. You should not edit war to try to force your changes. This is especially important on articles related to Covid-19, where there are special community sanctions applicable (which you were alerted to above). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:20, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]