User talk:Vigneswaran Rajkumar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Sockpuppetry
case

You have been accused of

sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vigneswaran Rajkumar for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. WuhWuzDat 03:52, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

I have reset your blocked and extended it to 1 week for
block evasion through on IP. Regards, MuZemike 03:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Sockpuppetry
case

You have been accused of

sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vigneswaran Rajkumar for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. WuhWuzDat 02:27, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

dear admin

hello admin. i do not understand why my account have been listed for sockpuppetry. i am the only one this account. i would like to request to lift the ban. thank you.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vigneswaran Rajkumar (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i would like to request to lift the ban as i am the only one using my account.

Decline reason:

You have misunderstood the problem; the problem is not that other people are using the same name, but that you are using several different accounts, including User:Cinefan, User:Sivafresh, and others. In addition to that, you seem to be using your account to advertise your company, which is against the rules. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:23, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vigneswaran Rajkumar → Fivevillage

Admin note

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vigneswaran Rajkumar before unblocking. WuhWuzDat 17:27, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Admin

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vigneswaran Rajkumar (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am aware of the rule as i have read through them throughly. My apologize if i cause any inconvenience. I am not using my account to advertise a company. The page was under the scope of wikipedia's specific category. There are several reference and link was taged. And Before i could even revise and expand the article, the account is block and deleted. I would like to request to unblock my account. Thank you.


Please include a decline or accept reason.


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AfD nomination of No Ten Dollars Ride

What Wikipedia is not
").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

sign your comments
with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

articles for deletion
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a

talk) 01:08, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Indefinitely blocked

Because of your repeated acts of

sock puppetry, you are now indefinitely blocked. You have been given enough chances, but yet you continue to abuse multiple accounts. Regards, –MuZemike 21:56, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
]