User talk:Villwock

Thank You for your contributions to the page Black Creek, Wisconsin. I'm glad that things are now cleared up. I've also taken the population data table off. Many Thanks 1014cd (talk) 15:46, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ~dee^(talk?) 18:39, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi. An article needs to have more than just a picture and a caption. See
  WP:Your first article and WP:Writing better articles for good general advice. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:18, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Thank you for uploading

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 03:39, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What year did you take this photo File:SargeBoydAB.jpg? It looks like it was copied from a book or newspaper, so it is not your own work. Who took it? ww2censor (talk) 03:44, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You never answered this question. ww2censor (talk) 15:15, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This layout is really very unattractive because the images intrude in to the section headers. Left handed images only look good when there is enough text for the image not to intrude into previous or next headers. ww2censor (talk) 15:15, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the "hangon" tag you placed - that is only required if an article is proposed for speedy deletion, and at present this article is not. The "maintenance templates" at the top are not a threat of deletion; they are suggestions for improvement, and add the article to lists which may encourage other editors to come and help. JohnCD (talk) 17:36, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ECMB-Audience2009ByVernBarber.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa ^(Talk) 22:35, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ECMB-MeganEhresmannFluteAB-2byVernBarber.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa ^(Talk) 22:35, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that photos are not categorized in the topic categories for the things that the photos happen to depict; they only go in categories that are meant for images themselves. That is, File:BlueBandshellPPTbyVernBarber.jpg belongs in Category:Images of Eau Claire, Wisconsin and Category:Images of musical groups; it does not go in Category:Eau Claire, Wisconsin, Category:Cities in Wisconsin, Category:Entertainment or Category:Culture, or any other category that's meant for articles. Bearcat (talk) 23:07, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you've been adding and changing information on the page "Black Creek, WI". I would like to inform you to NOT change the information if you don't have reliable sources. And if you have a reliable source please site it. I'm only saying this because we don't want false information out there. Thank You. 1014cd (talk) 21:32, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your changes, and will explain on

When an article already exists on a topic, rather than copying the text across and violating the

Temple of Free Masonry -- if you wish to start an RM discussion on the talkpage there, feel free. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:14, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

I see that you edited the article to indicate that the building is known locally as the Masonic Center. Could you please participate in the "requested move" discussion at

Talk:Temple of Free Masonry? (That's how we deal with naming issues at Wikipedia.) --Orlady (talk) 01:00, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

File permission problem with File:ECMB2009-BillboardCrppd.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ECMB2009-BillboardCrppd.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:29, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ECMB2008-BusAdCrppd.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:31, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The documentation for {{Infobox NRHP}} states that the name field should contain the "Name of the NRHP. Preferably the exact name listed on the register". Please stop changing these fields to match your preferences, rather that the National Register documentation. Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:49, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered,

]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:2010July22-TimKoehlerAB2-crpped-byVernBarber edited-1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:2010July22-TimKoehlerAB2-crpped-byVernBarber edited-1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:18, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent upload of File:Kiddie parade at Owen Park in Eau Claire, Wisconsin.jpg is noted. Whilst Wikipedia accepts a vast range of media, you are urged to consider if you really do want this image to be present on a public site, where it could be used for many purposes over which you, the subjects of the photo, their parents or guardians may have little control.

It is also strongly suggested that your confirm your relationship with the photo subjects and their guardians in an appropriate manner with a suitable administrator. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:43, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:17, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am wondering how this image is a "blatant violation" of copyright laws when I am the one who created it. Villwock (talk) 22:19, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The image was found on http://www.eauclairemunicipalband.org/, which the original nominator forgot to state. We would need an email submitted to permissions-en at wikimedia dot org indicating that either they own the image and are willing to release it under a free license, or that they got the image from you to use on their website and that you still hold the original copyright. Wikipedia:Donating_copyrighted_materials#Granting_us_permission_to_copy_material_already_online has more information about what we require as permission and who to submit a letter to. If you still have questions, you can ask them here, and I'll do my best to respond. Harryboyles 14:58, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not uploaded files that are already here - it causes much confusion when checking for copyright violations (which is is - as it's an non-attributed copy) - it was already at File:ECMB-2011KiddieParade1aByVernBarber.jpg  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:55, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarge Boyd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarge Boyd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 19:18, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]