User talk:Virgilanthony

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Greeks. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. NebY (talk) 19:23, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly encourage you to read Talk:Greeks#Jeffries quote as it now stands and to follow the Google Books link that is in the opening post of that section, [1]. It appears from your edit summaries and posts that either you have not done so or that - and I hope this is not true - you are knowingly editing disruptively and making false claims despite the evidence. NebY (talk) 19:24, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@NebY A quote should be a full quote. Edit to ibclude the fu quote, pages, sources etc. Very simple. Benefits readers too. Virgilanthony (talk) 19:26, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you now agree that the 60,000 figure is in the source cited and quoted? NebY (talk) 19:32, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:Greeks. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. NebY (talk) 21:04, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User constantly insults and uses brute force when he misinterpret a written text. He does not read the sources, misinterpret them and refuses to read them when invited to do so. He does not even listen to third party editors'. He prefers his pro-Greek POV to intellectual honesty. No matter how right someone could be. On here you can see all [2] [3] FierakuiVërtet (talk) 22:32, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Virgilanthony! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Greeks. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. NebY (talk) 20:21, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Virgilanthony reported by User:NebY (Result: ). Thank you. NebY (talk) 20:29, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've protected the article for week. I will expect to see discussion on the talk page, and if the edit-warring starts up again when this expires, expect blocks. Black Kite (talk) 23:49, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Virgiliosarvanitis per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Virgiliosarvanitis. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators:

IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 09:15, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]