User talk:Wcwells2

WP:NFT. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply

Speedy deletion of The Welch Principle

criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content

.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Abhishek ^Talk^|Contribs 03:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Academy for Science and Design

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Academy for Science and Design, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article is not built from independent, reliable sources (WP:V), and does not explain how it meets the notability guidelines (WP:N) - level of activity is not an indication of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page

.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 (talk) 17:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

June 2014

cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history

, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is

Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Mikaey, Devil's advocate 15:52, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply

]