User talk:Werter1995
Hello! I noted your corrections on the sources in this article, and in addition to saying thank you for what you have already done, I wanted to ask if you would do more?! I would like to take this article to FA status, and in order to do that, every source needs to be fully accurate. It took me a year to find them in the first place and it's a lot for one person to recheck alone. I could really use the help. I would be grateful! Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. Yes, I plan to finish the design of the sources, but at the moment I’m going to go to bed;) I live in the UTC+4 time zone. As soon as I wake up and get to the computer, I’ll continue. — Werter1995 (talk) 19:33, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Bless you! I have sent you a gazillion thank you's already, and it's not enough! I can't possibly thank you enough! I am so overwhelmingly grateful for all you have done. However do you find these? I would like to know how to do what you have done here. All I know to do is slog through them one by one, and since there are over 600, that's a long slog.
- I do have one other question in addition to how you work your magic. This Dif [[1]] has Shlomo Lambroza showing up in red, which I think means there is no link, am I correct? I didn't do anything because I wasn't sure, but does that mean that link should be removed?
- So I am asleep while you are awake, but that just means I get to wake up to wonderful surprises! That could not be better! This is truly amazing. Thank you. Jenhawk777 (talk) 21:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- I type the person's name into Google search and see if there are any relevant links. Regarding Shlomo Lambroza, see WP:REDLINKS, he is a notability author, and redlink is desirable. — Werter1995 (talk) 07:14, 13 January 2024 (UTC)]
- One at a time then. WOW. I don't know exactly how it has happened, then, that we have ended up with red links - meaning those pages do not exist. I have had to remove them, but there were only about 6, so no big deal. I still think that this is a great addition that I am genuinely grateful for. Is it possible they are on other WP's not the English WP? That would have to be designated. Whatever happened with those few, this is great work. I never would have done this - so I'm glad you did! Thank you! Jenhawk777 (talk) 23:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- No red links allowed in an FA. Jenhawk777 (talk) 23:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- This is very strange... Werter1995 (talk) 03:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- @WP:REDDEAL, it's general policy not to remove redlinks without specific cause; if a FAC reviewer gets stinky about it, they're doing it outside of the FA criteria. Generalissima (talk) 06:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)]
- The one time I applied for an FA, a reviewer removed them, and told me it is an "informal policy" because they just don't look professional and that's what FA has to look like. Jenhawk777 (talk) 08:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Argh. That's always irritating when reviewers throw in their personal preferences. The only time they're not kosher for FAC is in the lede. Generalissima (talk) 20:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- The one time I applied for an FA, a reviewer removed them, and told me it is an "informal policy" because they just don't look professional and that's what FA has to look like. Jenhawk777 (talk) 08:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- No, these articles are not available in other language versions; I searched and provided most of these links. — Werter1995 (talk) 03:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- No red links allowed in an FA. Jenhawk777 (talk) 23:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- One at a time then. WOW. I don't know exactly how it has happened, then, that we have ended up with red links - meaning those pages do not exist. I have had to remove them, but there were only about 6, so no big deal. I still think that this is a great addition that I am genuinely grateful for. Is it possible they are on other WP's not the English WP? That would have to be designated. Whatever happened with those few, this is great work. I never would have done this - so I'm glad you did! Thank you! Jenhawk777 (talk) 23:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- I type the person's name into Google search and see if there are any relevant links. Regarding Shlomo Lambroza, see
- So I am asleep while you are awake, but that just means I get to wake up to wonderful surprises! That could not be better! This is truly amazing. Thank you. Jenhawk777 (talk) 21:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Usernames
If you wish to report potential username violations, you need to go here:
]- Sorry, I didn't know about this. On Wikidata and the Russian Wikipedia this is also posted on the same page. I'll keep it on mind. — Werter1995 (talk) 14:42, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Mikail Romanov
Why did you delete Mikail as son of Anna Petrovna Tcini09 (talk) 14:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- I am not an administrator, I could not delete this article. — Werter1995 (talk) 15:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Draft:Maison+
Hi, why did you submit
- You may like to look at using User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft as that will do the tagging and notifications for you. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 11:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm sorry I didn't do that. — 31.29.192.159 (talk) 17:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- And this page was created a identigfity blocked user in violation of block. Currently the page was deleted. — 31.29.192.159 (talk) 17:03, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
User:Francoishabib/sandbox
why did you delete my page, can you please be kind and explain to me what was wrong? Francoishabib (talk) 12:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- See is not a webhost service for your bio. — Werter1995 (talk) 12:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)]
- Fair enough I understand but I am not related to the person and I am not that person based on your assumptions. I do not think it is fair to delete something I spent time working on it searching and trying to find reliable sources. based on your experience what do you suggest I can do to prove you that I am not using a Wikipedia as a webhost for my bio. Additionally, can you be so kind and help me at least get a draft of what I wrote. I actually spent time on it and didn't have it printed or saved anywhere. I was writing it based on research. Francoishabib (talk) 13:08, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- If the person you are writing about meets the main space. Your draft had no sources or evidence of meeting the criteria for encyclopedic significance (see Wikipedia:Notability (academics)). — Werter1995 (talk) 13:39, 5 March 2024 (UTC)]
- If the person you are writing about meets
- Fair enough I understand but I am not related to the person and I am not that person based on your assumptions. I do not think it is fair to delete something I spent time working on it searching and trying to find reliable sources. based on your experience what do you suggest I can do to prove you that I am not using a Wikipedia as a webhost for my bio. Additionally, can you be so kind and help me at least get a draft of what I wrote. I actually spent time on it and didn't have it printed or saved anywhere. I was writing it based on research. Francoishabib (talk) 13:08, 5 March 2024 (UTC)