Search results
There is a page named "User talk:WhySoSerious?" on Wikipedia
- the top of the page. Whispering(t) 20:29, 22 January 2019 (UTC) Hello, WhySoSerious?. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for...55 KB (4,521 words) - 00:29, 4 February 2024
- Hi Why so serious 8(, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish...4 KB (186 words) - 14:43, 20 November 2021
- the log entry regarding this warning: Clayton Bennett was changed by Why so serious editor (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-06-10T17:46:29+00:00...4 KB (458 words) - 20:07, 17 February 2023
- to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes...13 KB (1,188 words) - 00:00, 23 November 2021
- with, thats just too fricking serious!, but the real question was actually.. Why so serious? then...seriously and serious, were first! BUT...............3 KB (393 words) - 16:13, 22 April 2015
- User:UBX/Why so serious? is part of WikiProject Userboxes. This means that the WikiProject has identified it as part of the userboxes system. WikiProject...25 bytes (0 words) - 01:47, 19 February 2021
- User:Evb-wiki who placed the tags. --SoWhy Talk 13:01, 5 July 2008 (UTC) I was still editing when you added the tag. So you admit you have no knowledge of...36 KB (5,398 words) - 15:59, 20 February 2023
- sentence. Thanks, Why so serious? Talk to me 11:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC) I have re-added the source here my friend. Why so serious? Talk to me 11:59...67 KB (7,919 words) - 13:59, 12 February 2023
- You appeared out of nowhere to edit the highly controversial article Alt-right. This raises some obvious questions: Have you ever edited Wikipedia under...475 bytes (71 words) - 03:07, 27 January 2018
- sections, like the one on crime, were almost laughable (if the issue wasn't so serious) to anyone who has spent significant time in Venezuela over the past several...87 KB (10,702 words) - 01:13, 26 May 2022
- enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This...9 KB (581 words) - 21:24, 4 March 2023
- if you cannot substantiate why there should be a page about you. Regards SoWhy 07:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC) Hello SoWhy, about "This includes assuming...199 KB (19,033 words) - 05:17, 4 August 2022
- Hello, WhySoooSerious, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such...3 KB (435 words) - 20:36, 2 September 2016
- Hey SoWhy, thanks for deleting all of those spam edits - I appreciate your work on that. Happy editing to you! -FlyingToaster (talk) 22:50, 2 October...104 KB (14,023 words) - 22:12, 2 March 2023
- Hello, LeverageSerious, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Yorkshire County Cricket Club. I hope you...25 KB (1,861 words) - 00:48, 28 November 2023
- mentioned in the 3rd one are serious enough that many will require more time no matter how ready you really are. Regards SoWhy 21:22, 24 December 2009 (UTC)...201 KB (24,294 words) - 16:21, 14 March 2023
- page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —Why so serious? Talk to me 07:13, 1 February 2011 (UTC) Your edits here to the article...3 KB (289 words) - 08:32, 1 February 2011
- enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This...28 KB (2,673 words) - 20:56, 16 May 2022
- Places of worship in Bangalore. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Why so serious? Talk to me 09:22, 28 January 2011 (UTC) You currently...7 KB (636 words) - 09:38, 28 January 2011
- display, so I will just give the full edit summary for this edit here instead: Reverted good faith edits by WhyHellWhy: Look, I completely understand why you...15 KB (1,510 words) - 12:11, 30 May 2022
- [3] has no explanation of why the editor's amendment was problematic. This was not vandalism, but a well-intentioned change, so the editor deserves a reason
- this: ~~~~. Thank you! Why do you feel the need to attempt to silence Martin Fleishmann. Scientists conitinuing his work are progressing so well. I hope you
- 2014 (UTC) The last time I looked at that article, it needed some very serious help. I will consider working on it if I can find some time. --Jomegat