User talk:Willow4

Pruning shears

Hi Willow, I've just seen your new article on

secateurs

, but it seems this is a British term not understood in the US (don't know about Commonwealth). So I was going to suggest moving the "Secateurs" material to your "Pruning shears" article and then distinguishing between all the different types/names on one page (with redirects from the other terms).

Would you like to add your twopenn'orth on this idea at Talk:Secateurs? And check that I've got it right, as it looks like you have specialist knowledge! Cheers, JackyR | Talk 17:21, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Chelsea IMG 3664a.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chelsea IMG 3664a.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

48 hours after 12:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. |EPO| 12:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Adriaan Geuze

A "{{

Addhoc 18:59, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion of
Enkaku-ji

CSD a7

.

Under the

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon

}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 05:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of William Gillespie

guide to writing your first article

.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kevinkor2 (talk) 05:48, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Unreferenced BLPs

unreferencedBLP

}} tag. Here is the list:

Robert Holden (landscape architect) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Brian Clouston - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:34, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Sissinghurst123.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sissinghurst123.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the
CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
) at the site of the original publication; or

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter

OTRS pending

}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at

non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. /ƒETCH COMMS / 19:08, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Environmental good

The article Environmental good has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looks like confusion between an article and category. It is close to nonsence.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I am One of Many (talk) 04:09, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of
Context theory
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Context theory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Context theory until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randomeditor1000 (talk) 15:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]