User talk:Wolfinruins

Pages That I Have Focused On...

neurosis

good job with the honor found in decay article! been meaning to add to the main band article as it's pathetically small.

Referring to reviews

Hi. When referring to what reviewers have said, please attribute the quote to the reviewer, not just to the review site/publication. For example, "John Doe of Music Reviews said, ...". I've cleaned up your edits at Construct (album). Thanks. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 19:08, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Date formatting

Please ensure when adding dates to articles (such as you did at The Stench of Redemption and In the Minds of Evil) that you follow the established date format for the article. In these cases, these are articles about American subjects (Deicide albums), and as such follow American date formatting. This is Month Day, Year (ie. December 24, 2013, not 24 December 2013). Thank you. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 19:20, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Self-published source by Scaruffi

Thanks for your recent edits. When you edit other Scaruffi's reviews, feel free to add a summary like this one with a link proving the consensus for other contributors:

" rv

wp:self published source by Scaruffi per wp:consensus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums#Piero_Scaruffi_-_Final_Verdict_on_using_him_as_a_source_in_reviews

"

Woovee (talk) 15:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your edits over Megadeth's albums, put please don't remove his reviews if the number of other reviews in the article is deficient. Keep in mind that someone has put great effort in improving those articles. Thank you for the understanding.--

talk) 18:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

The Scaruffi reviews are being removed not because the quantity is deficient, but in accordance with

Wolfinruins (talk) 19:29, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

The only two albums I do not support removing Scaruffi are

talk) 20:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Fair enough - I'm not bent on removing it, although it does depart from the above guidelines. I'll try to find some alternative sources that meet the above guidelines and fulfill your analysis.

Wolfinruins (talk) 21:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

The consensus reached on January 2014 is clear https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums#Piero_Scaruffi_-_Final_Verdict_on_using_him_as_a_source_in_reviews : Scaruffi's reviews are
wp:reliable. Consequently, all his reviews are going to be removed in the next weeks by several contributors. If someone didn't apply this decision and put back Scaruffi's reviews on articles, an administrator would be contacted promptly. A first warning message would be posted on the talk of the contributor like it was already the case for this person here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Soul_Crusher#Verdict_is_in_-_he.27s_unusablehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Soul_Crusher#Piero_Scaruffi_Verdict Woovee (talk) 16:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Orphaned non-free image File:Deathspell Omega Mass Grave Aesthetics.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Deathspell Omega Mass Grave Aesthetics.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:59, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]