User talk:Worley-d

Hi there, just wondered if you would help on a new article i am creating (gathered you may know from comments on Stoubridge Junc. page), Round Oak Steel Terminal. Cheers--Greenfinch100 15:35, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Woo! It's Dave Worley! Partay! Born Acorn 00:50, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hide the expensive stuff first though. FiggyBee 16:27, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See reply. Also, don't forget to sign with "~" four times.

Simply south 22:46, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found some sources, both BBC, if you are interested. See the talk page. One of them requires a video player e.g. realplayer but may work with windows media player or anything else suitable.

I will add these to the reference list.

Simply south 23:25, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• 2002 - 2003 are in this Excel document
• 2004 - 2005 are located seperately here for more up to date figures

If you are interested, why not join

Just sign yourself up under the partipants. It is entirely voluntary. Go to Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways#Participants.

Also

Simply south 00:54, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are a regular contributor. Could you please tell me if the Midland Main Line reaches Burton-(up?)on-Trent please? I don't find any reference to it on the Midland Mainline page. Worley-d 23:18, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, Burton-on-Trent is a traditional Midland station; the undercroft at St. Pancras in London was specifically designed to accept beer kegs coming down from Burton. Today (2007) there are 1-2 direct Midland Mainline services to London per day. Outside of the rush hours Burton station is on the line from Derby-Birmingham and served by Virgin CrossCountry and Central Trains. Topologically, the station can be reached via either by reversing south from Derby, or taking the direct curve north of Trent Junction which heads due east. Hope that helps! Sladen 08:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at your notice on

You can now add three-letter codes and lat/long coordinates, to UK station articles. see Hamstead railway station for an example. Regards, Andy Mabbett 21:14, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, I got confused with Washwood. do you know who deleted the part about it actually happening at Lambrigg, it is a fact, not just some text added on there?

thanks

--Llamafish 16:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

lol, don't look at me - I didn't put the bio infomation in - blame Dave :) Icecold 13:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Catch me who can
Catch me who can

Thanks for the hours of work you must have spent developing the routebox for

Butetown Branch Line. Simply south 11:38, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Is there still a promise of a better picture for the Stourbridge Town railway station article? The current one, which you admitted was "artistic", is not especially illustrative or helpful. --RFBailey 16:57, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Preston railway station you nominated as a good article has passed , see Talk:Preston railway station for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Rt. 15:11, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the other line speeds!

Perhaps you know some more for the

I have to say that info on line speeds is a major gap in articles like that.

Regards,

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. RadioFan (talk) 02:27, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Droitwich Spa Junction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Droitwich Spa Junction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:45, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Preston railway station has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:23, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]