User talk:X4n6

		The Modest Barnstar
		In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.0.36 (talk) 18:56, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	For you cogent contribution to Talk:Tom Eyen on the subject of infoboxes. Edwardx (talk) 11:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Nice work on the piece on Willie J. Hagan. I caught that in the New Pages queue and found it to be well done. Thanks for your effort! Carrite (talk) 04:30, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For work on Mohsen Milani. Thanks. Bob. scope_creep (talk) 12:14, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

X4n6, thank you for the barnstar. It was a great unexpected surprise when I saw it in my talk page and I want you to know that I truly appreciate it and your kind words. For me it has been a pleasure and an honor to have interacted with you. You take care, my friend. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:40, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, sir. The feeling is genuinely mutual. I'll look forward to the opportunity to work with you again. Until then, please see your talk page. Best regards. X4n6 (talk) 04:30, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been among the best people that I have ever interacted with. Therefore it is with great pleasure that I have placed your user user name in my Wall of Honor. Tony the Marine (talk) 22:38, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Marine 69-71: My goodness! I really don't know what to say besides thank you, Tony. I am deeply honored and genuinely touched. But I'll also continue striving to earn such high praise. This will serve as a potent reminder in that effort. Many thanks again, continued best and warm regards. X4n6 (talk) 06:41, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from Lauren Boebert and Talk:Lauren Boebert for a month, for edit warring at the article combined with persistent bludgeoning of the talkpage. I note in particlular that you misleadingly called this article edit a copyedit and, bafflingly, removed a talkpage post by Objective3000, no reason given. This was brought up on Objective's talkpage, where, instead of restoring their post with a humble apology for an either very aggressive or very careless action, you generously conceded that "I won't object to you restoring it". Not good enough. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Also, I have a comment to you about how you manage this, your own, talkpage, even though it's not relevant to the block. You're allowed, with certain exceptions, to remove posts on it. But I hope you understand that anybody reading the page history will be unimpressed by the way you promptly remove 100% of anything criticism-like, while keeping 100% of all compliments, thus turning the page into a festival of congratulation? Bishonen | tålk 12:34, 21 May 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]