User talk:Xavthius

Archives

11/30/2006 - 05/06/2007 5/07/2007-11/05/2007

• New Category: Category:Former members of Evangelical parachurch organizations
• New Articles:
  Bad apples excuse

plus seriously buffed up

Care to check my work? ClaudeReigns (talk) 11:50, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure.. I'll try to get around to it.

Starting with item one... Regarding Former members of Evangelical parachurch organizations. GCC doesn't consider itself a parachurch organization, they consider themselves a church. In the 1991 Error Statement it reads:

This allowed a prideful attitude to develop toward other churches, para‑churches, and organizations, a sinful attitude we deeply regret. ... Similarly, our convic­tions concerning the centrality of the local church as God's vehicle for evangelism and discipleship were communicated in such a way as to cause Bible schools, seminaries, and para‑church organizations to be viewed as "un­scriptural."

So my only thought on the new category is that you are categorizing them as something they claim not to be, which could constitute OR without a source categorizing them as such. Perhaps just name it Former members of Evangelical organizations?

talk) 17:31, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Might further want to specify that it is Evangelical Christian organizations you are classifying. But maybe not. I guess it demands on what you're trying to accomplish/categorize with the category.

talk) 17:36, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for uploading Image:PaulRMartin.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to
   di-replaceable fair use disputed
   }}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before

Hi, I'm concerned about the link you replaced on the Potter's_House_Christian_Fellowship page. I have serious doubts about the authenticity of this link since it is not the primary source and is not on a reliable site. This site is filled with unsourced and unverified negative information that is hearsay and low quality. If anyone can verify this reproduced source then I will agree with it remaining. I feel that since this reference is contended perhaps it should be moved to the discussion page? 124.149.63.82 (talk) 13:49, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed it to point to the rickross.com version. Xavthius (talk) 01:17, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Xavthius: You are being accused of being "me" see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IZAK. Thanks, IZAK (talk) 22:44, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cult-Proofing Your Kids until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

]

Orphaned non-free image File:CultProofingYourKids.png

Thanks for uploading