User talk:Yoko santoso

Welcome!

Hello, Yoko santoso, and

welcome

to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! VegaDark 01:20, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

recent edits

If you are going to put edits like recent ones about chinese ancestry that is quite offensive to some readers (even if it is true) - you need to have refs or cites for those

Suro 12:30, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Also - sunan ampel article has no category or project tag on the talk page or any indication that it is a stub - do you want help?

Suro 12:31, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Wali sanga

Thanks for your efforts on these. But we really need to have sources cited. Technically, any unverified work can be removed. See

WP:ATT. Please provide sources. kind regards and happy editing. --Merbabu 13:39, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion of "Pee Wee Gaskins (band)"

A page you created, Pee Wee Gaskins (band), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a band or other musical group, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for musical groups in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our

guide to writing your first article

.

Thanks. Tombomp (talk) 14:12, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Do not use all capitals in reference citations - please try to use lower case as well -and the other thing - this is WIkipedia EN inggeris - the usage of Indonesian language references is not really appropriate - it would be like going onto Wikipedia IN and using english ciatations -

Suro 15:09, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Contoh - Muljana, Prof. Dr. Slamet (2005). RUNTUHNYA KERAJAAN HINDU-JAWA DAN TIMBULNYA NEGARA-NEGARA ISLAM DI NUSANTARA. Yogyakarta: LKiS, p. 86-101..

There is no need to have it in capitals

It is unlikely that a normal user of Wikipedia EN is able to either access or read this as a reference, if you only know of Indonesian language references - they would be more useful on WP IN - than WP EN
Suro 15:15, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello

We do have rules about english on english wikipedia_ this is one of the templates: -

(1) I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. See Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines.

Hey you did the right thing - you left a message at my talk page - but you must sign.

(2) Ok - the photo is not parangtritis - and I am Australian - ok? tetapi saya tinggal di yogya banyak tahun lalu. ok?

Suro 15:36, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

(3) (1) and (2) do not add up? - the big problem is that when we try to write articles in WP English about Indonesia - there are some times when we cannot find english sources. But - we must try to abide by the important principals of

Suro 15:42, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button

located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 15:59, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Chi Chern

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Chi Chern, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://chan1.org/mastercc.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

talk) 04:40, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Chichern.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Chichern.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

48 hours after 01:04, 5 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 01:04, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Johncrook.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Johncrook.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

48 hours after 01:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 01:06, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Johncrook2.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Johncrook2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

48 hours after 01:09, 5 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 01:09, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:DDMlotusbell.jpg

permitted conditions

then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant
copyright tag
.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 08:31, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:DDMbuddhahall.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading

image description page

.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 23:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Guojun.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Guojun.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the
this list
) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
here
.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 23:30, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Guoyuan.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Guoyuan.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the
this list
) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
here
.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 23:30, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Chichern2.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Chichern2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the
this list
) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
here
.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 23:31, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pagemoves

Please don't try to change the name of a page by copying-and-pasting the content of (old name) into (new name); this breaks the attribution history and has to be repaired by an admin.

Also, don't create a disambiguation page if it only disambiguates between two pages and only one of them exists. Once you've created an article on Mr Child the Dharma Heir, then we can disambiguate between the hockey player and the Dharma Heir. DS (talk) 14:49, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dharma Drum Mountain Buddhist Association

Hello, Yoko santoso, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Dharma Drum Mountain Buddhist Association, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

It helps to explain why in your

Ghost 02:02, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of Guo Jun

The article Guo Jun has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patchy1 22:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]