User talk:Yooden/Archive 1

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I would recommend adding the World War I Weapons of the United Kingdom category to

Howdy! I've added back the nuclear reference you redacted from VA-111 Shkval. I assume you removed it because there wasn't any sourcing on the statement, so I included a reference in the talk page. If you removed it for other reasons, then I would like to suggest using the edit summary in the future to avoid this type of confusion. Regards, CHAIRBOY (☎) 21:38, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Yup, now I added the summary. --Yooden

Hi there! I see that you removed the text again. If the reference I provided wasn't sufficient, could you let me know what quality of reference you consider good enough to merit leaving it in? My understanding is that the nuclear warhead was key to the original Shkval design, considering that it had no terminal guidance, and that its primary role was as an anti-carrier force weapon (detonating a subsurface nuke would certainly affect a tight fleet). Thanks! - CHAIRBOY (☎) 23:58, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Hi, das war nur zum Informieren. OK Ciao Gilliamjf 06:20, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Yooden I don't want anti-Semitic people posting crap on my Talk page so stop it Battlefield 13:31, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, I can see nothing anti-Semitic about Cool Cat's statements. --Yooden

I am referring to your anti-Semitic statements here Citation and then screwing around with my talk page. Cordially Battlefield 15:32, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

You probably don't want to imply that anything in that block in anti-Semitic, so please point out what exactly you are referring to. Use the edit history if that helps or just plain quote my statement here. --Yooden

Please don't include insults in your edit summaries, as you did in your edit of

I think the error I fixed speaks for itself. --Yooden

If so, why did you need the insult? JG of Borg 13:51, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

To explain why I inserted the 'US' instead of 'national'. The only criterion I could go by is the narrow-mindedness typical to USians. --Yooden

Hi Yooden, I noticed you voted Delete on Canadians_detained. The proposal was to rename. Could you re-check your vote ? Thanks. -- Ze miguel 15:12, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Done, sorry for the sloppy reading. --Yooden

No problem, thanks. -- Ze miguel 15:50, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

I wondered why you substituted "Landshut Entführung" for "Entführung der Landshut." While your replacement arguably is the correct German genetive construction, the shorter "Landshut Entführung" was commonly used in the German media (and that explains why the title of the article is (the directly translated)

Sorry, I remember differently. Google backs me up. --Yooden

What kind of answer is that? Come on. This is not how we discuss things in wikipedia. If you take the 1,610 against 1,360 hits for "entführung der landshut" and "landshut entführung", resp. as your only argument in support, forget it. Ben ^T/_C 21:18, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in helping clean up the ship categories and articles, however I must ask that you first review the material at

I read the project page. It explains the policy, but gives no reasons. So what are the reasons to add a large number of essentially empty categories? (Maybe you should explain that not here but in the deletion section.)

The AfD is different. Current

Deutschland class cruiser is a better name for the page, but I wanted to do one step at a time. I see no reason to split the class page into two parts, one to explain a very common nickname, one for everything else. Again, please give your justification for this. (Again, maybe not here but in the deletion section.) --Yooden

I hope this wasn't directed at me?Michael Dorosh 23:12, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Sure it was. Do you think you you made a level remark about the topic at hand?

I don't blame you, I really don't, but things heated up and the attacks started to fly back and forth. --Yooden

Just thought you might be interested that

Hi Yooden. Please sign with four tildes (~~~~) instead of three. This will place a timestamp next to your signature, which is invaluable for others reading a discussion. Thanks. ~MDD4696 03:19, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Doh! Didn't realize about the preferences. For some reason though, your format wasn't showing up in my preference before, seems to be ok now, shows up the way I want, I trust it does at your end as well.

I used blank ISO dates before, they have to be wikilinked to do their magic. Everything looks fine at my end. --Yooden

Yes, it's funny, but indeed there are RPGs about RPGs. The most famous is probably Hack Sign, a console RPG that consciously mimics a holographic MMORPG and some applications (such as a newsgroup for the "MMORPG.") I'll go add this in.

The article BattleTech technology, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup . If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's article 's talk page. You have been left this message by PocKleanBot, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on PocKleanBot's talk page.

I have opened an RfC on whether to refer to these ships as battleships or battlecruisers. Since you have participated in this debate previously, please have a look, read the debate, and make your views known:

This is just a heads up that I've merged the history of your old userpage at Yooden with User:Yooden. I Hope you don't mind. Graham87 07:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

And your old user talk page history is at

User talk:Yooden/from Talk:Yooden. Let me know if you want anything done to it - I can do a history merge there if you like. Graham87

07:12, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. Yes, it would be nice if you could do a history merge for my /Talk. Thanks for your work! --Yooden ☮

Done. You're welcome - I love looking at old page histories in Wikipedia. Graham87 15:30, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Why did you put the notice on my userpage. I didn't create the article.--

I know, but you made a number of edits and I thought you'd like to know. --Yooden ☮

Howdy Yooden, since the article has achieved featured status, a large scale change like this needs to be discussed - could you join me on Talk:Aikido? Thanks! —Mrand ^{Talk • C} 14:15, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much.