User talk:Yummgumm

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Paul Gray (American musician), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use
  block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism
  .
• Cluebot produces very few
  false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here
  , remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning:
  talk) 21:39, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CIreland (talk) 21:49, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 21:55, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

These are two of your edits:

• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paul_Gray_%28American_musician%29&diff=prev&oldid=364000174
• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paul_Gray_%28American_musician%29&diff=prev&oldid=364000334

These are Ahpook's

• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paul_Gray_%28American_musician%29&diff=prev&oldid=364000720
• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paul_Gray_%28American_musician%29&diff=prev&oldid=364000768
• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paul_Gray_%28American_musician%29&diff=prev&oldid=364000826

I'm going to assume good faith and guess you re-added vandalism because of inexperience with the interface. Please don't call other editors "douchebags", however.

CIreland (talk) 21:58, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 07:46, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supercute! until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 04:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]