User talk:ZX2006XZ

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Thanks for uploading File:Walt Disney Pictures 1985 logo (1990 version).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Walt Disney Pictures 1995 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Walt Disney Pictures 2000 (Flashlight) logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Walt Disney Pictures 2006 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Walt Disney Pictures 1985 logo (1990 version).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:59, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Walt Disney Pictures 1995 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:00, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Walt Disney Pictures 2000 (Flashlight) logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:00, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Walt Disney Pictures 2006 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Night at the Museum Kahmunrah Rises Again.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 01:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just because Mike Mitchell is the executive producer of Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken. His production company got an uncredited involvement during the production of the film. I think it should be stay put and (uncredited) because Mike and his partner Margot Rubin, attended the LA premiere of the film last summer. I think that’s fair. Exteahans71 (talk) 14:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is proof https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/margot-rubin-and-mike-mitchell-at-the-premiere-of-ruby-news-photo/1261552010 Exteahans71 (talk) 14:14, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. We know that Mike Mitchell ep'd Ruby Gillman, but that doesn't mean his company was involved. ZX2006XZ (talk) 14:30, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

can I just leave it uncredited just in case. Exteahans71 (talk) 14:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't hold my breath. Remember how I removed that sourced TV spot back on March 28 because I said it looked fake? ZX2006XZ (talk) 14:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know, that tv spot was just fanmade. Exteahans71 (talk) 14:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user has been responsible for a mass of unsourced or badly sourced information on this page. I've raised a case at ANI should you care to comment.[1]. Barry Wom (talk) 08:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at The Garfield Movie, you may be blocked from editing. Mike Allen 15:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MikeAllen Cite where I didn't provide an adequate explanation. ZX2006XZ (talk) 15:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added a source to Snoop's character. You removed it with a revert with NO explanation. You have not provided a source for the Wayfarer Studios or Liz Wilson additions. You just keep repeating "watch trailer" which does not satisfy

WP:CITE. You must cite a source in the article. Also, the trailer does not have the words Liz Wilson or Wayfarer anywhere, so not sure why you keep mentioning the trailer. Mike Allen 15:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

And you still keep creeping them into the article with no source. Why do animated film articles attract editors like this? I give up trying to maintain these pages. It's a lost cause. Mike Allen 15:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Walt Disney Pictures.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Consensus was never reached on this topic of the PG-13 film list and you have failed to provide adequate reasoning for inclusion, besides basic triviality. I've already stated that mentioning the studio's first PG-13 film is notable enough (and perhaps that the studio continued to produce more PG-13 films in general), but anything more is unnecessary. This is an ever-growing list of films that will continue to expand as time goes by and will dilute the impact of your point even further. Please stop adding this content back into the article. I'm getting tired of dealing with this, and I will report you if you keep doing it. ~ Jedi94 (Want to tell me something?) 00:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]