User talk:Zaxem/Archive 1

Hi, I posted a defense of the article True Torah Jews, I would like to ask you to be so kind and read it, and than rethink your position on deletion.

Bloger 00:12, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for voting in my recently unsuccessful RfA. I plan on working harder in the coming months so that I have a better chance of becoming an admin in the future. I hope you will consider supporting my if I have another RfA. Thank you for your comments. --digital_me^(t/c) 15:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Zaxem/Archive 1, thank you for participating in my RfA. It passed with an amazingly unopposed 77/0/1. Thanks for the support everybody! If you see me doing anything wrong, want to ask me something, or just want to yell in my general direction, leave me a note on my talk page. I promise to try and knock out Wikipedia's problems wherever I may find them!

Staxringold _talk^contribs 20:48, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Hello, Zaxem/Archive 1, and thank you for voting on my recent RfA! With a final vote of 84/1/4, I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. I will be slowly acclimating myself to my new tools over the next months, but welcome any and all feedback and suggestions on how I might be able to use them to help the project. Thanks again! Kukini 15:04, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, your support is welcome – Gurch 16:20, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Zaxem, thank you very much for your support in my recent Request for adminship, it passed with a final tally of (65/3/3) - which I find both amazing and humbling. I wish I had time to thank everyone personally, but I'm afraid all I can offer is this token of my gratitude. I hope to live up to your expectations/hopes. If at any stage you need to contact me, for help or a request or to point out a mistake in my conduct, please make sure to tell me on my talk page. --Fir0002 08:19, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Although no consensus was reached in the end, I still wanted to thank you for your vote in my recent RfA. Thank you very much. Fritz S. (Talk) 17:57, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for voting! Hello Zaxem/Archive 1, and thanks for your support in my recent RfA. I'm pleased to announce that it passed with a final tally of (96/0/0). I was overwhelmed by all of the nice comments and votes of confidence from everyone. Thanks again, and see you around! OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:42, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Hey Zaxem, just a quick note to let you know I withdrew my RfA at 13/11/10. Cheers for your support. :) --james^(talk) 11:04, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your support on my RFA, which closed successfully this morning with a result of (53/2/1). I've spent the day trying out the new tools, and trying not to mess things up too badly :). I was quite thrilled with all the support, both from the people I see around every day, as well as many users who I didn't know from before, yet wrote such wonderful things about me. I look forward to helping to serve all of you, and the project. Let me know if there's anything I can help you with. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 04:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello Mr. Zaxem, do you remember our talk about

Thanks for your support on my RfA. Give me shout if I can be of help. Thanks/wangi 00:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the message about this article. The current form seems encyclopedic and notable. Tyro 05:27, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello, I just wanted to ask you a couple of questions on the new performance timelines by User:tennis expert that you recently approved. It is the opinion of a few wikipedians that his new timelines look rather displeasing, and, while they highlight information quite well, the colorways tend to clash, leading the timeline to look more like a mosaic than a timeline. Now, what has been happening is the displeased wikipedians have simply reverted the timelines back to the old ones, and in response, tennis expert has (understandably) reverted them back. In this situation, what are a group of concerned wikipedians to do? The obvious solution is to try and compromise with tennis expert, however, he seems convinced that his timeline is the new standard, regardless of what others think. As a relatively new member, I wonder: is there any way to organize a discussion with all wikipedians concerned with this change, including tennis expert, in order to come up with a reasonable compromise? I thank you for any assistance you may provide. --Flute138 03:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your support of my RfA, which has passed with a final tally of 76/1/1. With this overwhelming show of support and approval I am honored to serve Wikipedia in the task charged to me and as outlined in my nomination. Happy editing to you! Teke ^(talk) 17:41, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your support in my not-so-recent WP:100). I guess infinite monkey theorem has been officially proven. Chimps really can get somewhere on Wikipedia. With new buttons come great responsibility, and I'll try my best to live up to your expectations. If you need assistance with something, don't hesitate to swing by my talk page or email me (trust me, I do respond :)). The same goes for any complaints or comments in regard to my administrative actions. Remember, I'm here for you. (Thanks go to Blnguyen for the incredible photo to the right.) alphaChimp laudare 05:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi Zaxem, thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which was closed as successful today with a finaly tally of (56/0/3). I will be very careful at first to avoid any mistakes. Please feel free to leave a message in my talk page if you have any comments/suggestions about me in the future. Once again, thank you! --WinHunter (talk) 09:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, Zaxem, for your support at my RfA, which finished with a tally of 94/1/0. I hope I live up to the confidence you have shown in me in my activities as an administrator. JPD (talk) 16:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

can you please return to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunter Irrigation and explain your comment because this company is very notable Yuckfoo 08:11, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you, Zaxem, for voting on my RFA, which passed 95 to 1. Now that I have the mop, I hope I can live up to the standard, and be a good administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. —

I noticed that you recently participated in the discussion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy St. Clair (4th nomination). You may also be interested in the following discussions for the following collectible card game players:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darwin Kastle
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivier and Antoine Ruel
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommi Hovi
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Selden
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kai Budde
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Long
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Finkel (2nd nomination)
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic: The Gathering people

Thank you. --

Another thanks to Zaxem for correcting the spelling of Nathalie Grinham to

Nathalie Grinham. Cheers, SportsAddicted

11:11, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which finished with a tally of 52/6/1 (~90%). It was an interesting process which gave me a chance to learn a bit about myself and about the community. My intention now is to slowly ease into using those additional buttons on my page. No use being over eager and mucking up the works. The support of all those who went over my record and/or rallied to my defense after the big oppose vote was instumental to the success of this review. Again, thank you! --StuffOfInterest 12:18, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey Zaxem,

I just wanted to thank you for your support in my recent request for adminship, which passed unanimously with a final tally of 38/0/0. I appreciate your trust, and will do my best to uphold it. Don't hesitate to let me know if you ever need anything. — TKD::Talk 05:44, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Zaxem, thank you so much for your support for my RfA. I passed with a vote tally of 61/0/1. I am honored that the consensus was to allow me the added privilege of the admin mop. I appreciate your support on my RFA! --plange 23:09, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Please accept my thanks for your support in my successful RfA, which I was gratified to learn passed without opposition on October 25, 2006. I am looking forward to serving as an administrator and hope that I prove worthy of your trust. With my best wishes, --MCB 17:01, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for supporting my RfA that I have passed with 73/2/1.--Jusjih 10:02, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi Zaxem, and thanks for your participation at the NPOV ideals as fairly and reasonably as possible. Ombudsman 05:27, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi Zaxem, I am very thankful to you for supporting my succesful

) 06:58, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Hi Zaxem, and thanks very much for your support during my recent RfA, which succeeded with a final tally of 64/0/0. I am grateful for the overwhelming support I received from the community, and hope I will continue to earn your trust as I expand my participation on Wikipedia. It goes without saying that if you ever need anything and I can help, please let me know. Wait, I guess it does go with saying. ; ) --cholmes75 (chit chat) 22:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

		Mike's RfA Thanks
		Zaxem: Thanks very much for your support at my RfA. Unfortunately, it was clear that no consensus was going to be reached, and I have withdrawn the request at a final tally of 31/17/5. Regardless, I really appreciate your confidence in me. Despite the failure, rest assured that I will continue to edit Wikipedia as before. If all goes well, I think that I will re-apply in January or February. - Mike | Talk 04:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Dalbury's RfA

My RfA passed with a tally of 71/1/0. Thank you very much for your support. I hope that my performance as an admin will not disappoint you. Please let me know if you see me doing anything inappropriate. --

Donald Albury

10:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

RFA Thanks

Thanks!
Thanks for your input on my (nearly recent) Request for adminship, which regretfully achived no consensus, with votes of 68/28/2. I am grateful for the input received, both positive and in opposition, and I'd like to thank you for your participation.
Georgewilliamherbert 05:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your support!

A week ago I nominated myself, hoping to be able to help Wikipedia as an administrator as much as a WikiGnome. I am very glad many others shared my thoughts, including you. Thank you for your trust! Be sure I will use these tools to protect and prevent and not to harass or punish. Should you feel I am overreacting, pat me so that I can correct myself. Thanks again! ReyBrujo 21:02, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

thanks, I've templated and protected Nicholas Tam now, jimfbleak 13:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I wasn't going to send thank-you cards, but the emotional impact of hitting

23:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

Oh, the humanity! I had my doubts about accepting a nomination for a second RfA, but even I couldn't have predicted the stir it caused as it drifted to the ground in flames! Still, it was as educational as ever. Thanks for your input; it will be on my mind as I continue to edit Wikipedia, and perhaps I will have earned your support if another nomination comes around. Kafziel Talk 14:57, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for contacting me. Looking back, I am not sure why I tagged that for speedy deletion, so I do apologise. I don't think that it will be deleted, but the tag may be there for a couple days (at most). --Adam Riley ^Talk 01:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your input at my

Zaxem/Archive 1

---

Thanks for your support on my successful Request for Adminship (final result 78 Support /0 Oppose / 1 Neutral) I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. I will be slowly acclimating myself to my new tools over the next months. I am humbled by your kind support and would certainly welcome any feedback on my actions. Please do not hesitate to contact me. Once again, many thanks and happy new year! All the best, Asterion^talk 16:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

---