User talk:Zayya

Archives:

CSD A7 on Zaya Younan

Hi, I wanted to let you know that I have challenged your

WP:CSD A7 on Zaya Younan. In my opinion, the article makes several claims of importance, furthermore, it is sufficiently referenced to make a plausible claim for notability, which is a much higher standard then criteria A7. Remember that all an article must do to avoid criteria A7 is make a claim of importance, having a reference to an independent reliable source that discusses the subject is clearly such a claim. Monty ₈₄₅ 15:27, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

October 2011

deletion discussion. Monty ₈₄₅ 16:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of Nuri Kino for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nuri Kino is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuri Kino until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 23:45, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 14:57, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zayya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe this is an error. I am on a shared networked and aware of other editors but none whom I would deem malicious, disruptive or vandals. I have been an editor here for quite sometime and have contributed a great deal. Please unblock my account. Thank you for your attention to the matter.

Decline reason:

Appears to be a violation of policies. only (talk) 02:46, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Zayya (talk) 15:52, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And you just all happened to converge on the same articles like
Meatpuppetry is a deceptive practice.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 17:03, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
- Yes we do discuss Assyrian issues, Assyrian people particularly issues concerning Assyrian ethnicity. Surely that is not a crime? Zayya (talk) 18:39, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Crime? No. Against
    policy? Most certainly. —DoRD (talk) 18:41, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    - I haven't done anything against policy.Zayya (talk) 18:52, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - In that case, I have changed the block to indefinite. You will need to have a working knowledge of this policy before you will be able to proceed with editing.
        Ignoring policy won't work.
        — Berean Hunter (talk) 19:06, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply
        ]
        Clearly you can exercise your power to block me indefinitely even though you are wrong. I've been contributing here since 2005. I will not be accused of something that is not true. Zayya (talk) 19:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mili Mili World Music for deletion

A discussion is taking place to determine if the article Mili Mili World Music is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mili Mili World Music until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Lennart97 (talk) 10:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alfred Rasho

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply

]