Wikipedia Arbitration
About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy (CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals Report
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Contentious topics (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports (pre-2016)
Track related changes
t e

This is an archive of the results of all cases completed by the Arbitration Committee in 2022.

More recently-closed cases on top

2022

7 cases.

• Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Stephen#Final decision closed 7 December 2022 (AN notice)
  • The administrative permissions of Stephen are restored.

• Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block#Final decision closed 02 November 2022 (AN notice)
  • For breaches of Wikipedia's administrative norms, Lourdes is warned.
  • For conduct which fell short of the high standards of behavior expected of functionaries, the CheckUser permissions of TheresNoTime are removed. They may seek to regain them only through the usual appointment methods.
  • For conduct which fell short of the high standards of behavior expected of functionaries, the Oversight permissions of TheresNoTime are removed. They may seek to regain them only through the usual appointment methods.
  • For serious breaches of Wikipedia's administrative norms and of the CheckUser policy, TheresNoTime is admonished.
  • The Arbitration Committee wishes to express that Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures § Actions by parties to a proceeding does not apply to TheresNoTime given that a majority of active arbitrators had opposed desysopping them at the time they relinquished their adminship.

• Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct in deletion-related editing closed 2 August 2022 (AN notice)
  • 7&6=thirteen (talk · contribs) is topic banned from deletion discussions, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
  • proposing an article for deletion ("PRODing"), but not contesting a proposed deletion ("de-PRODing"); and (3) turning an article into a redirect. This sanction supersedes his March 2017 community topic ban
    . This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
  • Lugnuts (talk · contribs) is warned against making personal attacks, engaging in battleground behavior in deletion discussions, and other disruptive deletion behavior. If Lugnuts should engage in disruptive behavior related to deletion, broadly construed, an uninvolved administrator may block him (in accordance with the standard enforcement provision) or impose on him a topic ban for up to one year.
  • Lugnuts (talk · contribs) is banned from taking the following actions: (1) participating in deletion discussions, broadly construed; (2) contesting a proposed deletion ("de-PRODing"); and (3) creating articles that comprise less than 500 words, including converting redirects into articles. This remedy supersedes his December 2021 community topic ban. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
  • Lugnuts (talk · contribs) is indefinitely banned from Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
  • TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) is topic banned from deletion discussions, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
  • The Arbitration Committee requests comment on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion.
    • The
      request for comment (RfC) will take place at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Requests for comment/AfD at scale
      and the discussion will be moderated by editor(s) appointed by the Arbitration Committee.
    • The moderator(s), with community feedback, will be responsible for developing the questions presented.
    • The moderator(s) will also be responsible for supervising the discussions, and ensuring comments remain relevant and focused. To maintain decorum, moderator(s) may collapse comments, move comments to the talk page, remove comments entirely, ban editors from the process, or take other reasonable actions necessary to maintain decorum.
    • The RfC will be announced at
      centralized discussion template
      .
    • The request for comment will be closed by a panel of three editors with experience closing discussions and who will be appointed by the Arbitration Committee prior to the start of the RfC. The closing panel should summarize the main points brought up in the discussion and evaluate what consensus, if any, exists within the community.
    • Any appeals of a moderator decision or of the panel close may only be made to the Arbitration Committee at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.

• Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/WikiProject Tropical Cyclones closed 27 May 2022 (AN notice)
  • MarioProtIV (talk · contribs) is indefinitely banned from closing, or reopening, any discussion outside their own user talk space. This restriction may be appealed after 12 months.
  • Chlod (talk · contribs) is warned about using off-wiki platforms in an attempt to win on-wiki disputes.
  • talk · contribs
    ) is warned about using off-wiki platforms in an attempt to win on-wiki disputes.
  • LightandDark2000 (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic banned from pages about weather, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed six months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
  • MarioProtIV (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic banned from pages about weather, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed six months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
  • Leaders/moderators of off-wiki chat platforms (i.e. IRC, Discord, Telegram) should consider the following practices for their platform:
    • Advertised on-wiki, including at relevant Wiki Project pages and more general pages (e.g.
      WP:DISCORD
      ).
    • Instructions and links on how to join are provided.
    • Users are asked to authenticate to their onwiki identity.
    • The rules and expectations are posted in a prominent place (e.g. a read-only channel).
      WP:OUTING
      are considered in those rules and expectations.
    • There is active moderation to enforce the rules and expectations. The moderation team is made up of trusted members and is sufficiently large for the size of the platform/channel.

• Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Geschichte accepted and suspended 17 March 2022, closed automatically 31 July 2022 (motion)

  The "Geschichte" request for arbitration is accepted. This case will be opened but suspended for a period of three months.

  If Geschichte (talk · contribs) should return to active editing on the English Wikipedia during this time and request that this case be resumed, the Arbitration Committee shall unsuspend the case by motion and it will proceed through the normal arbitration process. Such a request may be made by email to [email protected] or at the clerks' noticeboard. Geschichte is temporarily desysopped for the duration of the case.

  If such a request is not made within three months of this motion or if Geschichte resigns his administrative tools, this case shall be automatically closed, and Geschichte shall be permanently desysopped. If tools are resigned or removed, in the circumstances described above, Geschichte may regain the administrative tools at any time only via a successful request for adminship.

• Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing closed 3 March 2022 (AN notice)
  • Rp2006 (talk · contribs) is warned against a battleground mentality and further incivility.
  • living people associated with or of interest to scientific skepticism
    , broadly construed. This topic ban may be appealed after six months have elapsed and every six months thereafter.
  • talk · contribs
    ) is reminded to remain collegial in editing and interacting with others.
  • Roxy the dog (talk · contribs) is warned to remain collegial in editing and interacting with others.
  • GSoW is advised that a presence on English Wikipedia, perhaps as its own WikiProject or as a task force of WikiProject Skepticism, will create more transparency and lessen some of the kinds of suspicion and conflict that preceded this case. It could also provide a place for the GSoW to get community feedback about its training which would increase its effectiveness.
  • Editors are reminded that
    aware
    of these discretionary sanctions under awareness criterion 1.

• Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Jonathunder accepted and suspended 26 February 2022, closed automatically 28 August 2022 (motion)

  The "Jonathunder" request for arbitration is accepted. This case will be opened but suspended for a period of six months.

  If Jonathunder (talk · contribs) should return to active editing on the English Wikipedia during this time and request that this case be resumed, the Arbitration Committee shall unsuspend the case by motion and it will proceed through the normal arbitration process. Such a request may be made by email to [email protected] or at the clerks' noticeboard. Jonathunder is temporarily desysopped for the duration of the case.

  If such a request is not made within six months of this motion or if Jonathunder resigns his administrative tools, this case shall be automatically closed, and Jonathunder shall be permanently desysopped. If tools are resigned or removed, in the circumstances described above, Jonathunder may regain the administrative tools at any time only via a successful request for adminship.