Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement 2/Notification list

Main case page (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Workshop (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk)

Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD

→ Important notes for all contributors to this case

This case is contentious and has the ability to devolve very quickly. So, this is a heads-up on the procedures that have been adopted.

First off, the clerks have been instructed to be very proactive in removing any inappropriate comments. These include:

a. any allegation unsupported by evidence and

b. any allegation (whether supported or unsupported) against non-parties.

Furthermore, the case will use a "single warning" system: clerks are authorised to issue an only warning to any editor who posts inappropriate comments; if the warning is not heeded, the editor may either be restricted from participating in this case or be blocked at the clerk's discretion. This applies to everyone, which includes the parties, involved onlookers, semi-involved onlookers, and people who wander in randomly (whether truly random or not).

Finally, to prevent "drive-by" attacks and attempts to devolve this case, the case pages will be semi-protected and additional scrutiny will be paid to accounts that haven't participated in this dispute beforehand. If a new editor or an IP editor genuinely has something that needs to be said, they may ask a clerk to post it on their behalf.

For the Committee,

Salvio

^{Let's talk about it!} 23:34, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The users on this list will be notified by

the main case page

. Only clerks or arbitrators may add or remove other people to and from this page. Non-parties who participated in the case request (and did not specify not to be notified in their statements) were batch-added to the notification list.

Involved parties

See /Parties.