Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Éamonn Ó Catháin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was

WP:SNOW delete. There appears to be immediate agreement among everyone, including the article subject, that this article should not be here. BD2412 T 05:12, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Éamonn Ó Catháin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, cited to a single unreliable source, and person claiming to be this person demanded deletion and right to privacy Atsme 💬 📧 20:40, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Authors. Atsme 💬 📧 20:40, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per above. Autarch (talk) 20:58, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm going to
WP:BLPREQUESTDEL applies. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:10, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:29, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I took a look though the edit history of this article and there are bona fide privacy and safety issues noted in the editing history. While the subject is mildly famous, the right to privacy and safety out ranks this, in my opinion and therefore
WP:BLPREQUESTDEL applies. If anyone is about to vote keep here, take a look though content that was removed and apply some compassion please. CT55555 (talk) 21:50, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete safety concerns aside, I'm not sure what this article is supposed to be about/why do they need a wiki page. Appears like a badly written CV. Non-notable individual. Oaktree b (talk) 00:01, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sounds autobiographical at best and in either case,
WP:GNG not met. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 00:20, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per nom. Spleodrach (talk) 12:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.