Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/(A) Katy Perry
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No consensus can be determined, defaulting to "keep." Also it seems to meet
WP:NALBUMS because of the "significant independent coverage in reliable sources" clause. Malinaccier (talk) 00:43, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
(A) Katy Perry
Unreleased album with no coverage from
]- Note The above user is a confirmed sockpuppet. talk) 22:28, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this talk) 18:55, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge referenced content to the appropriate section of the artist's article. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:03, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete after merging the referenced content to Perry's article. There's no need to preserve a redirect from the title of an unreleased album. —C.Fred (talk) 19:50, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: The only youtube sources are refering to the music videos. The other information has been gathered through a series of interiews with Perry. The songs recorded are verified by the ASCAP. ~ Themonkeyofdoom (talk) 03:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: the album is never released by Perry herself, it doesn't meet WP:ALBUMS. It failed notability requirements. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 11:00, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You mean ]
- Keep People need to read up on WP:NALBUMS properly before using it to alarm a delete. It clearly states unreleased albums "may be notable if they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources" - now it has pretty significant coverage in both Blender here - where it is the subject of and reason for an interview (her first real exposure, yes, due to this recording), and also Billboard here - where it is included, described and covered in a sort of biography of her career so far. It is a notable moment in her career that has received coverage and holds it's own, it's existence is not merely trivial like many other unreleased or scrapped albums. kiac. (talk-contrib) 13:21, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per kiac's sources. It passes WP:NALBUMS as it has the independent coverage in reliable sources, as stated. talkingbirds 21:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per User: Kiac. Apparently recerived coverage in reliable sources.--PinkBull 23:08, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.