Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/( ) (disambiguation)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawing as per Metropolitan90. Since it is the first time I close an AfD, can a more experienced editor please check I did not foul up? Thanks! Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 15:33, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
( ) (disambiguation)
- ( ) (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I think the article covers a
]- Redirect to Emoticon. Mnmazur (talk)
- Comment I think we should include the symbol "()" in the article, but I fear that "( ) (disambiguation)" would be an extremely ]
- Keep. Given that there is an album by this name as well as a film, both of which have Wikipedia articles, having a disambiguation page isn't a bad idea. The bad idea was to name these items ( ), but there's nothing Wikipedia can do about that. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I must say I was unaware we had an article about those two masterpieces of rhetoric; therefor, apart from vaguely feeling old, I withdraw this nomination... Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 11:05, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Even though I'm not sure about the whitespace just redirecting it to the emoticon page makes no sense. Gonna add a link to 'brackets' on there too.--Savonneux (talk) 23:09, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The pre-existing hatnote already on ]
- Keep three entries is an acceptable size for a dab page. 70.29.208.247 (talk) 04:24, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Perfectly fine disambig page. Lugnuts (talk) 06:59, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.