Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1007 in philosophy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

1007 in philosophy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List with 1 entry » Shadowowl | talk 09:42, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:52, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per above, and therefore not notable enough to warrant its own article. Merge A better option than simply deleting and the destination article exists now anyways. Rosalina2427 ^{(talk to me)} 19:25, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Per WP:POKEMON, WP:ATD, WP:PRESERVE and WP:R this page and any other similar stub pages for 10XX in philosophy should be combined into 11th century in philosophy, which is certainly notable. James500 (talk) 01:34, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge. James500 made a good point in previous AfDs, that there are likely some books, such as this one, covering philosophy during time period. No opinion on whether the most appropriate merge is to a century article or an even larger time period though. — Alpha3031 (t • c) 02:14, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Alpha3031: In terms of a larger time period, I could suggest Medieval philosophy and Renaissance philosophy, unless there's one that would fit better. Rosalina2427 ^{(talk to me)} 03:10, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus at the previous AfDs was for centuries. There is enough coverage to make an article for the eleventh century. James500 (talk) 13:30, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:01, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:01, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to 11th century in philosophy. XOR'easter (talk) 15:05, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to 11th century in philosophy, or perhaps simply delete as the birth of a person who became a philosopher is hardly a notable event of 1007. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:26, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Our timeline articles have always included births and this reflects the practice of professionally published chronologies. James500 (talk) 17:05, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to 11th century in philosophy. No need for sparse single event entries, but one for the century makes sense.Icewhiz (talk) 18:21, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to 11th century in philosophy as per everybody else. Ajf773 (talk) 20:10, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge as per everyone, as I've just
  1499 in philosophy. No need to drag this out. rchard2scout (talk) 13:15, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Merge to 11th century in philosophy as per everyone else and all the same logic we used at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1700 in philosophy. --David Tornheim (talk) 08:57, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.