Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1017 vs. The World

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  11:43, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1017 vs. The World

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A tape that was released one day ago is

WP:TOOSOON. Google search shows that the tape exists, which is not notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:16, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the
talk) 04:31, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Keep - Many sites have been covering this release, including Complex, HotNewHipHop, DatPiff, and others. This is very much notable JayPe (talk) 3:34, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
    • Keep - Sites have already begun covering this project in much bigger ways, the fact that some editors can't even wait a few days (let alone a few hours) before trying to delete content they're unfamiliar with is pretty ridiculous. It's gotten absolutely out of control, we add projects BEFORE they're even out constantly every single day, but too argue it's TOO SOON to add an album that was released a few days ago and has been trending worldwide is illogical and honestly quite laughable. I feel like I need to point out that music critics, and review aggregators cannot cover EVERY SINGLE ALBUM THATS RELEASED THE MOMENT IT COMES OUT. This would result in them posting hundreds of reviews per second, inhumane. The fanbase for this content alone is more than enough to qualify notability, not enough for you? Chill out and for once have some damn patience. Cheetoburrito (talk) 14:34, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above comments.
    Aoba47 (talk) 17:59, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.