Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1337 Gallery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 15:29, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1337 Gallery

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not find any reliable sources covering this studio or the game. Delete per

WP:GNG

. I am also nominating the following articles:

--Odie5533 (talk) 18:00, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:59, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. All sources seem to be primary sources, no secondary reliable sources. Not notable. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 14:07, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all 4 articles - software developer and 3 programs from that developer, all lacking significant coverage in reliable sources needed to establish notability. A search did not reveal any significant RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 11:22, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.