Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2004 Summer Olympics Medals Earned Per Capita

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 01:56, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2004 Summer Olympics Medals Earned Per Capita

2004 Summer Olympics Medals Earned Per Capita (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

2006 Winter Olympics Medals Earned Per Capita (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - added to nomination — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 18:41, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for all the same reasons previously discussed at

• It seems that the "Medals per capita" issue has been discussed before in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1996 Summer Olympics medals per capita and there was a consensus to delete such articles. So bit it. In reading the discussion by those in favor of deletion it was surprising to me to read such dismissive comments about the reasons why people might find the "medals per capita" approach informative and useful. The standard "Medals Per Country" is informative but certainly an imperfect reflection of a given country's athletic prowess. "Medals per capita per country" is also imperfect but it does provide additional insights beyond the "medals per country" approach. In my own experience outside of wiki I have seen many people informally struggle to determine the "medals per capita" to help their understanding of Olympic results so I took the time to put together this table. It saddens me that the wiki community would not find this information helpful — Sybcollector  19:09, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The issue is not that it isn't "informative" and/or "helpful"; the problem is that the article fails one of Wikipedia's core policies, namely Wikipedia:No original research. Your calculations are a synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position. Hope this helps — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 19:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the precedence nominations as well as policy. Punkmorten (talk) 21:55, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. But only for reasons of
  stare decisis. GreenGourd (talk) 02:24, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.