Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 in Argentina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nominator fails to advance a policy-based argument for deletion;

Not a snowball's chance of deletion. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:10, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

2010 in Argentina

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unimportant and unnecessary Calu2000 (talk) 16:21, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. —Hue Sat Lum 16:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. —Hue Sat Lum 16:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - A whole year in a country of 40 million people was "unimportant".
WP:AFD is needed (perhaps at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Argentina) since it won't do to delete just this article and leave the rest. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 17:08, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep No policy based rationale from the nominator. This is part of bigger scheme/series and issues of expansion/sourcing should be address via WP:ARGENTINA, as per Black Falcon. Lugnuts (talk) 18:30, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Lugnuts, this kind of article is something you would expect to see in an encyclopedia. The nominators rationale strikes me as
WP:SALAT as being neither too general nor too specific. Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 21:57, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Procedural Keep – No policy-based reason for deletion has been presented, per
WP:DEL-REASON. Also, this is part of a series of Years in Argentina articles. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:25, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep - This is a standard topic. KTC (talk) 00:33, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.