Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Douglas shooting

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 08:32, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Douglas shooting

2011 Douglas shooting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I imagine there will be claims that the sporadic updates by largely regional sources constitutes "ongoing coverage". But really, it is

historical significance. Heck, there weren't even any routine repercussions from the investigation or civil suit; the shooting was deemed justified. Of course, no one has to be charged to make an incident notable but it certainly would have created some case of significance in an otherwise unnotable event. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 18:18, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The shooting and death are not of lasting significance. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:07, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- I'm not seeing lasting significance or societal impact here. Coverage is routine. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete even if it passes GNG it still fails
    WP:NOTNEWS. D4iNa4 (talk) 18:04, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.