Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Paris explosion (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Valley2city^‽ 20:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Paris explosion

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The previous two AfDs were started shortly after the event, so there may have been an indication of this being a lasting event. However, four years on it's clear that

WP:NEVENT

.

The sources in the article, albeit from global outlets, pretty much mimic each other:

WP:DEPTH. Google searches for this event bring up very little beyond January 2019 outside of passing mentions (and sensationalist recounts

), and the manslaughter charge (which I cannot find an outcome for, so it appears to not have been notable enough to report on the result).

I propose this be redirected to

already done that. Anarchyte (talk) 11:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and France. Anarchyte (talk) 11:18, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to
WP:LASTTIME). The sole exception is one that provided primary sources. I will change my !vote if someone can find in depth retrospective coverage from multiple sources after there were no more developments in the story. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 14:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment Some lasting effects as discussed in the Fr wiki article, one victim lost the use of their legs and asked the mayor of Paris for help when they ran for President, not sure how relevant it is. [1]. Gas explosions are routine, this wasn't Notre Dame that caught fire... Oaktree b (talk) 15:04, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 22:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as having substantial persistent coverage in reliable sources, clearing the
WP:NEVENT provision for significant non-routine coverage that persists over a period of time.. -- Visviva (talk) 01:25, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep A case of Significant coverage. Okoslavia (talk) 09:05, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - Seven sources including BBC and CNN clears
WP:LASTING. Enough good info that it wouldn't fit well in List of Explosions. No urgent reason to delete. Last1in (talk) 19:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:36, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The continued coverage over victim compensation is enough to make it appear relevant to me. PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:36, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Continued coverage per above and passes
WP:NEVENT with ease. Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 22:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2019_Paris_explosion_(3rd_nomination)&oldid=1167118557"