Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 FIBA U16 Women's African Championship squads

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:53, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2021 FIBA U16 Women's African Championship squads

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. A list full of non notable players failing

WP:NLIST and not covered in independent sources. LibStar (talk) 01:01, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

1. This article is not a 'Stand-alone' list, but a list of players with their information such as height, weight, date of birth, club, jersey number, etc. 2. Please see this section Wikipedia:Notability#Notability guidelines do not usually apply to content within articles or lists
The players as an individual contained in this article may not be notable, but the groups containing these players are notable.
3. Merging into the main article may be an alternative. Regpath (talk) 04:12, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

also fails

WP:GNG, where is the coverage of these squads in third party sources? LibStar (talk) 04:50, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Lists of people, Basketball, Algeria, and Egypt. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:53, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strongest possible delete - fails
WP:DOB; With identity theft a serious ongoing concern, many people regard their full names and dates of birth as private. Wikipedia includes full names and dates of birth that have been widely published by reliable sources, or by sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object to the details being made public. Please, please consider these points and delete this article from Wikipedia. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:00, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete for child protection and data privacy reasons, as U16 = children, and Wikipedia should not be re-publishing lists of non-notable children without any reliable secondary sources whatsoever conferring notability. Agree with comments made by Spiderone, and no, we should not be merging these lists into another article. Cielquiparle (talk) 10:51, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.