Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20th Century Masters: The Millennium Collection: The Best of John Mellencamp
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
]20th Century Masters: The Millennium Collection: The Best of John Mellencamp
- 20th Century Masters: The Millennium Collection: The Best of John Mellencamp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources found besides a terse Allmusic review. Album did not chart or earn RIAA certification. Fails
WP:NALBUMS. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 06:54, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - My opinion is that per precedent in the Albums Project, notice by AllMusic grants sufficient notability for an album, and Wikipedia is an encyclopedic project in which the discographies for a notable artist should be complete. It's true that these "Masters" collections aren't much to get excited about though. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:38, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - One reference, and it is a good reference, is unfortunately enough to keep, but it's not like it's an unknown band trying to get free advertising. Passionless (talk) 15:21, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tone 12:12, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
- Delete This is not an original work, which would be notable . I think the standards of notability for a mere repackaging would be higher than a mention at allmusic or any other website, as would be for any other class of material. The review in allmusic just amounts to a track listing--perhaps because there is nothing to review--the list of songs tells everything necessary or possible to be said. If NOTDIRECTORY has a meaning, it applies to such catalog information. DGG ( talk ) 15:57, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Non-charting non-notable compilation. Allmusic entry consist of a tracklist and little else. JacksOrion (talk) 07:11, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.