Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20th Century Masters – The Millennium Collection: The Best of Cat Stevens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

20th Century Masters – The Millennium Collection: The Best of Cat Stevens

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded based on Allmusic review. However, a search finds absolutely no other secondary sources. Precedent is that just an Allmusic review is insufficient. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 17:26, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The album has not been reviewed by multiple sources or charted. It has not been reviewed by Allmusic anyway as link goes to a different 20th Century Masters album, this looks like the real one. Mattg82 (talk) 18:13, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I added the AllMusic link earlier today but messed it up, as Mattg82 noted above. I have since corrected the link and it now goes to a formal AllMusic album review. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:11, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:13, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - It has received a basic review from AllMusic and in my opinion (per precedent at
WP:ALBUMS) that confers a basic amount of notability for inclusion in this encyclopedic project. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:13, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete allmusic attempts to live up to its name: be a record of ALL music. If inclusion of a short review there meant it was notable for wikipedia, wikipedia would be inundated with albums otherwise non-notable. A notable artist's discography should be complete. That doesn't mean each compilation album needs an article. Wickedjacob (talk) 07:33, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:17, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep. In my opinion, the Allmusic review is enough. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 21:08, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per previous John Mellencamp AFD. Non-charting non-notable compilation. Almost non-existant coverage. JacksOrion (talk) 23:49, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of multiple, reliable, secondary sources to meet the
general inclusion criteria. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.