Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3053

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:45, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3053

3053 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Delete. A little premature to put it mildly. And it contains nothing of note. Will WP still be around in the year 3053? Yes, it will be.[
  In the year 2525, If man is still alive, ...." Alan began singing. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 00:59, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. The year is too far in the future to say anything verifiable about it. A single mention in a work of fiction is not enough for notability. JIP | Talk 06:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The article doesn't provide any useful information, and the Rainbow Mars mention is already in the Rainbow Mars article. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:30, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Snow Delete per above. I can't think of any reason to keep this as it stands.Tyrenon (talk) 12:00, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails
  WP:N. Also, we should not encourage creation of articles about years far, far in the future, because there is literally no limit, and articles about the years 1,000,000 through 1,999,999 etc could as easily be created. Edison (talk) 16:16, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per above JayJay^{Talk to me} 22:57, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- Most obvious one I've ever seen. 71.246.200.190 (talk) 04:46, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]