Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/411 PAIN
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
]411 PAIN
- 411 PAIN (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This company does not appear to meet the
WP:CORPDEPTH. At the time of nomination, most of the cited sources do not contribute to notability: they are all primary sources (8, 11), routine coverage such as press releases (2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 10), etc. The only source that appears to have anything about the company is 1, and although I can't read it in full, the article appears to be about the type of service in general, not this specific company. —Darkwind (talk) 07:12, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Keep I spotted this company when researching something in highbeam research and googling it seems it is a major firm in this field. Highbeam Research has plenty of sources for 411-PAIN. Florida Trend cites it as a leading firm in its field in the state. That the article has been hijacked by
WP:GNG by number of reliable sources which exist on it.I can think of numerous companies on here and which are missing which are actually notable but not many sources write in detail on the history of the company and most sources are derived from newspaper articles mentioning them such as acquisitions and charity involvement etc.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 11:58, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:57, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.