Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AEON (electromagnetic)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:58, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AEON (electromagnetic)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion by Jan W. Vegt of his own pet theory. No evidence that anybody else has even noticed it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:06, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:12, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:14, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: promotional article. Flat Out let's discuss it 13:14, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am working in the field of the interaction between radar beams and matter. It is very difficult to find a publication about the subject Electromagnetic Interaction because it is always classified as confidential for military reasons. No army wants their radar beams to be deflected by any kind of equipment. I was surprised to see this article. The mathematical background looks OK to me. For the field where I am working in, nobody is interested in the interaction between electromagnetic fields and gravity. It has no practical applications. But the interaction between radiation and electromagnetic fields is much more interesting. For that reason I suggest to keep this information for public access... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harold25 (talk • contribs) 14:49, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I just did a drastic rewrite. —rybec 19:36, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Thanks for your effort and work Rybec. I would suggest in stead of ref 2(where all the equations are missing) this link: Electromagnetic Confinement

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wimvegt01 (talk • contribs) 01:53, 8 August 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete: From what I can glean from the actual content, it looks like AEON is basically a neologism created and used by exactly one person, which is not inherently notable according to the

not sure that wikipedia is the right place for that. I was under the impression that a theory had to be widely accepted or widely known about for it to be notable enough for inclusion into the encyclopedia. Otherwise it's basically just promotional. That said, I could be misunderstanding the policies, and if it can be rewritten to be more informational and to include sources other than ones associated with the idea's originator, or if it actually is notable and I am just ignorant of the context, then it should probably be kept. --anamedperson (talk) 16:54, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Just to clarify, I am not saying that the idea is not a notable, worthwhile idea in itself, just that the sources haven't demonstrated notability in the world at large, and using wikipedia to promote even a good idea is still promotional. --anamedperson (talk)

Comment: Dear Adirlanz... Thanks for your comment. It is not a subject on which only one person is working. The subject gets more attention in e.g. Russia than in U.S. because there it is military classified. One person who is involved in that subject is Volodymyr Krasnoholovets. He also calls Vegt in his references. (Ref. 28 en Ref. 29 in the publications below.

Krasnoholovets, Volodymyr (2001). "On the Way to Submicroscopic Description of Nature". doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.4824. On the Way to Submicroscopic Description of Nature

Krasnoholovets, Volodymyr (2001). "On the nature of spin, inertia and gravity of a moving canonical particle". doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.4824. On the nature of spin, inertia and gravity of a moving canonical particle

--anamedperson (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harold25 (talk • contribs) 02:06, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The comment about the Krasnoholovets papers was added by Harold25 (now blocked as a sock of Wimvegt01), not by Adirlanz, who also signs as "anamedperson." I checked the whois data for aeons.eu and the site is operated by Jan Vegt. —rybec 15:31, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Harold25 (talk • contribs) 22:25, 8 August 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

Delete
WP:NOTDIC this is currently a dictionary definition -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 01:17, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment:

Krasnoholovets also refers to Vegt in his references. (Ref. 7) in the publication below.

Krasnoholovets, Volodymyr (2002). "Gravitation as deduced from submicroscopic quantum mechanics". arXiv:hep-th/0205196. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help) Gravitation as deduced from submicroscopic quantum mechanics --Harold25 (talk) 07:02, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. The topic does not seem to be notable. Sławomir Biały (talk) 11:50, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. 173.68.110.16 (talk) 02:29, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: add this article the the reference list:

J. A. Armstrong; N. Bloembergen; J. Ducuing*; P. S. Pershan (1962). "Interactions between Light Waves in a Nonlinear Dielectric". doi:10.1103/PhysRev.127.1918. Interactions between Light Waves in a Nonlinear Dielectric --Wimvegt01 (talk) 16:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per nom, NN neologism. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:11, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/AEON_(electromagnetic)&oldid=1137529125"