Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/APECO (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. There are almost no reliable third party sources, and in any case the article does not say what the sources do. Ruslik_Zero 19:12, 16 April 2011 (UTC)}}[reply]

Aurora Pacific Economic Zone and Freeport

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is a blatant copyvio and advertising spam, the author created a duplicated version of this article in the (disambiguation) page, but he has blanked it out. Anyway this company or organization lacks substantially notability to have an article on wikipedia Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 02:04, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Subject of article appears to pass
WP:GNG, see significant coverage in reliable sources. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:06, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. This article would appear to have nothing to do with what the sources say. This article speaks of this business driving
Aeta people from their ancestral homes. The other article now 404s, but calls APECO a "threat to biodiversity", and the Google snippet says that it's "an amendment on the Aurora Special Economic Zone". The current text is pure shilling and has nothing to do with what the sources found say; even if this business were notable, it needs a do-over. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:53, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy redirect to
APECO is a straight copy. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:40, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Done but I moved the tag over and relisted the debate. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 05:03, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:48, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Clarification: The article to be discussed is now Aurora Pacific Economic Zone and Freeport. --Pgallert (talk) 10:16, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.