Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A State Of Trance 2008 (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure. Kesac (talk) 16:45, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A State Of Trance 2008
- )
This article has been deleted after an AfD before and was re-created within 5 hours of the closure of that AfD. Subsequent speedy (G4) was declined, because the album had been released since the previous AfD. A prod with reason "article on an album without any reliable independent sources. Article consists of little more than track listing, with links to promotional websites" was declined with stated reason "sources ARE reliable" (they may be, but they are not independent). In the more than 2 months that have passed since, no sources indicating notability for this album have been forthcoming. A Google search results in some track-listings, some websites where the album can be bought (or downloaded using torrents), and the website of the artist himself. Given the lack of
]- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 06:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The album is already charting on 4 Billboard charts, I added that info to the article. Since that's part of the notability criteria listed at Wikipedia:Notability (music), I think the article's a keeper. Raven1977 (talk) 06:33, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Hit album that has received independent coverage [1].--Michig (talk) 09:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep now. 4 Billboard charts, referenced. Passes ]
- Keep - if it's in the top 10 on two of Billboard's genre chats, that's enough for me. - Richard Cavell (talk) 10:38, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Waking up to a lot of ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.