Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Ward (musician)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 20:46, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Ward (musician)

Aaron Ward (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sounds like a good local musician, with a quote from Mick Jagger, but I can't find any sources. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:26, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:36, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:37, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment:
WP:SOCIALMEDIA. This helps to persuade me personally that Mr Ward is a living, breathing person, but you can see that the policy says articles must not be "primarily based on such sources". Anyone can create a social media account. If the band continues to enjoy success then, then local music magazines and others will take an interest. But even then, individual band members aren't often notable enough to get pages. We're currently debating whether to delete the page of Sowon, whose group had two number one hits last year. Matt's talk 09:53, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Delete -- Fails
    WP:GNG. I can find no significant coverage by independent reliable sources. As pointed out by M.R.Forrester, there are vandalism additions of Aaron Ward' and Jamie Crawford to the Fifty Shades of Grey article. That, along with the chatty commentary about this individual's current career as a sales clerk, suggests this article is a joke page. CactusWriter (talk) 17:53, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anoptimistix Let's Talk 03:33, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.