Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdelwahid Habibullah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 12:46, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abdelwahid Habibullah

Abdelwahid Habibullah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable martial artists. Does not meet

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non-notable martial artist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:19, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Per nom. Aust331 (talk) 16:12, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: per Wikipedia notability guidelines "multiple, reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article have written about that topic in some detail." Also per Basic_criteria. Altimbukti (talk) 22:09, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Neither the article nor my search turn up the significant independent coverage needed to meet
  WP:GNG. I also found nothing to show he meets the notability criteria for martial artists or authors. Papaursa (talk) 22:53, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Fails
  WP:NAUTHOR. Mdtemp (talk) 14:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Fails
  WP:GNG. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 08:21, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.