Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Nigam

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 03:23, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Nigam

Abhishek Nigam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NACTOR requires that the actor should have significant roles in multiple movies or TV series(emphasis on “multiple” ) The subject of the article doesn’t seem to satisfy any criterion from NACTOR. I believe this is way TOOSOON. Celestina007 (talk) 17:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete In the one case of a role that might add towards notability, it is not even one of the "main" roles, but a recurring one. We have never come up with a full agreement on what is and what is not significant, but one role is not multiple, and in this case it is not even unambiguously significant. I am reminded of how we do not have an article on
    Lois and Clark: The New Adventures of Superman she was one of 9 main cast billed performers in the opening credits. To be fair this was a case where what was a significant role just got cut a little into the show, if the pilot had not worked and had been made into a film as was the backup plan, Barondes would clearly have a significant role in a notable production. Of course I think Kenneth Kimmins would probably be able to be counted in a significant role in Lois and Clark even though he never got top billed. Of course Kimmins had several other roles, including one listed as main cast in the Sitcom Coach, so if that ever becomes and article and ever then comes up for AfD, the Lois and Clark role will not need much discussion. Unless we go down the road that Bernard Klein is a cult favorite with cult following. He is one of maybe 4 roles that are unique to Lois and Clark and not from the larger Superman universe.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:15, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete per analysis by John Pack Lambert. Shrikanthv (talk) 09:41, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As per all above. Cuoxo (talk) 19:39, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.