Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abner-Drury Brewery
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was WP:SNOW keep. Despite a few voices in opposition, the outcome of this discussion is now overwhelmingly clear. BD2412 T 17:26, 7 August 2020 (UTC)]
Abner-Drury Brewery
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Abner-Drury Brewery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This brewery doesn't seem to be notable. The article only cites two sources, one of which is a primary source and the other seems to only be a trivial mention in a book about prohibition. Plus, all I could find about it in a
]- Delete. As per nominator. Not enough reliable sources. Does not pass ]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:59, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Shellwood: Hi, we did quite a bit of work on this one. Would you mind having another look as seeing if you still feel like it is a delete? Thanks! Lightburst (talk) 02:18, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Lightburst: You pinged the wrong person. Shellwood (talk) 04:38, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Shellwood: Hi, we did quite a bit of work on this one. Would you mind having another look as seeing if you still feel like it is a delete? Thanks! Lightburst (talk) 02:18, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:59, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. I've found a bunch of articles in ]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:36, 4 August 2020 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:38, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Now ten sources but not all are sufficient for Notability purposes. Two sources are travel guides, they are OK for the cited facts but not notability. The masters thesis I don't think it qualifies for notability. As a reminder, "significant" doesn't mean volume of text, rather significance of what is being said in terms of indicating notability. The remaining 7 contain significant coverage per WP:GNG. (This list may change as new sources appear still early in the AfD). -- GreenC 16:43, 4 August 2020 (UTC)]
- Keep Notable company. WP:SIGCOV. Lightburst (talk) 17:42, 4 August 2020 (UTC)]
- KEEP The article has been massively improved today, ample reliable sources confirming notability. I find it amusing that Time magazine mentioned how this brewery delivered alcohol to the President as soon as prohibition ended. http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,847283,00.html I can't access the whole article, but found that amusing. Dream Focus 17:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- KEEP WP:HEY 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)]
- keep per HEY. Nice work! talk) 22:25, 4 August 2020 (UTC)]
- Delete, even post-HEY, as not meeting NCORP. Looking at WP:THREE sources. Also, it didn't exist for very long, so I'm not seeing any independent reason for notability. Lots of breweries came and went in many cities over the years, and you'll find all of them written about in contemporaneous newspapers and guidebooks. There's nothing recent or non-local outside of guidebooks and brief mentions AFAICS. Lev!vich 02:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)]
- Keep, per sourcing identified/meeting GNG. Undoubtedly more sourcing from a century ago exists, but this serves our readers fine until more is added which is routine editing. Gleeanon409 (talk) 03:08, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: The story of the post-Prohibition celebration seems to have entered into history; it's discussed in at least of three of the sources not in the article. I think that this demonstrates notability. — Toughpigs (talk) 03:45, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Good article (now), and clearly worth keeping. They might have to rename Heymann > Abner-Drury Brewery. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:48, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.