Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Absence paradox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Absence paradox

Absence paradox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable. The article has exactly one source, and extensive searching doesn't turn up any other relevant sources.

My searches found a music album with this name, significant unrelated hits for "presence-absence paradox", and some apparent Google-books search hits which are actually repackaged copies of Wikipedia articles (invalid as pure

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 02:25, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 02:25, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete – I can't find any other relevant sources either. (Though Google Books did suggest a David Icke tract as a "related item" at one point, which is always fun.) And even in the best hypothetical case, it doesn't seem to stand on its own as an article. If it were more clearly written, and if there were more evidence of the topic being discussed under this name, then the material might fit somewhere. XOR'easter (talk) 14:19, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - can't find any coverage suggesting it has any cultural relevance. I actually found more hits for an unrelated term, presence-absence paradox. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 19:59, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate]]. [[Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.