Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abysmal ooze
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete all. -
Mailer Diablo 09:56, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
Abysmal ooze
Dungeons and Dragons creature known only from the non-notable Dreadmire. Including in this nomination Aquatic ooze, Blood pudding (Dungeons & Dragons), Jelly curd, Jelly quasit, Jelly wraith, Ooze demon and Oozoid for exactly the same reason. Delete all Pak21 14:45, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
- Delete all Wikipedia is not a game guide Bwithh 15:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all ^^^^ what he/she said. shadzar|Talk|contribs 17:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all If the book was deleted as NN, it stands to reason that characters, creatures, locales, etc therein should also be deleted. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:50, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all, and be mindful of WP:SNOW--Rosicrucian 17:56, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT a game guide. Hello32020 19:40, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Articles roll a 1 Non-notable, get rid of 'em. EVula 20:18, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, merge and redirect for ]
- Comment What is your rationale for setting Blood Pudding apart from the rest?--Rosicrucian 21:14, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and WP:NOT. Hey, maybe the articles will roll a critical failure on their Wikipedia score and delete themselves. :) Justin Eiler 21:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete All as non-notable trivia. Fairsing 01:01, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete All per nom. --Agamemnon2 09:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete All per nom.--Robbstrd 14:09, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete All per nom except the titular abysmal ooze, which should redirect to benthic zone ➥the Epopt 02:05, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.