Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Achinoam Nini
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 04:50, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Achinoam Nini
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
No References for Notability. Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 00:42, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 01:57, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:16, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep on the basis of coverage in news media and books, as well as this listing in Contemporary Musicians: https://books.google.com/books?id=lho6AQAAIAAJ&q=%22Achinoam+Nini%22+-wikipedia&dq=%22Achinoam+Nini%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwij3KbOjt3fAhUE2IMKHeLsBk4Q6AEITDAom Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:21, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Text is lightly paraphrased version of bio info at subject's official site, and the edit summary "Official edit by Eli Katz on behalf of Achinoam Nini." leads me to add the talk page template accordingly. No opinion on notability currently, but there's no question this is talk) 04:57, 8 January 2019 (UTC)]
Keep Achinoam Nini is a very notable singer with a globe-spanning career. There is absolutely no reason to delete it because some PR person commandeered it. I reverted to the former version, which comes with 14 refs and demonstrates long-standing notability.--Geewhiz (talk) 06:25, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Clear failure of ]
- Keep: Appears completely notable. PamD 10:18, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - and close. Weird nom. Clearly notable. BabbaQ (talk) 19:25, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, I agree with the people who want to keep this! Davidgoodheart (talk) 04:17, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.