Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ackerville Baptist Church of Christ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn, no delete !votes given (non-admin closure) Pgallert (talk) 11:54, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ackerville Baptist Church of Christ

Ackerville Baptist Church of Christ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is a 'Historic Place' under US law automatically notable? I'm not sure this passes our inclusion policy at

I'm withdrawing my nomination based on the excellent explanation given by Ntsimp. Thanks, Ntsimp! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 11:42, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong keep Its on the Alabama Register of Landmarks and Heritage and National Register of Historic Places. Altairisfar 17:42, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep and Close The church is on the National Register of Historic Places, which makes it automatically notable. The nominator may wish to withdraw this request. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 19:07, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep It's on the
  NRHP. Yes, there is an assumption of notability for NRHP-listed places. LadyofShalott 19:21, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Yes, NRHP listed buildings or places are presumed notable. • Gene93k (talk) 19:58, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep as places listed in the National Register of Historic Places are presumed notable. - Dravecky (talk) 20:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep for the above reasons. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 22:52, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Reallllyyy Strong Keep ohh come on already, see above
  How'd I do? 01:28, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep No one has yet mentioned what I think is the real reason NRHP-listed properties have a presumption of notability: the nomination forms themselves always have a bibliography section listing sources about the site. Although the quality of these bibliographies varies, nearly all the ones I've seen definitely meet our notability standards. We should therefore assume the sources can be produced unless proved otherwise. Ntsimp (talk) 07:55, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.