Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam All

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adam All

Adam All (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Articuno appears (talk) 09:20, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 09:33, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:13, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Significant coverage by sources already used in article, e.g. [1], [2] and [3]. 15 (talk) 14:49, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep (for now): Don't
  WP:BITE too quickly. See where it goes and if it remains untouched by the middle of May then I wouldn't be so averse to deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plifal (talk • contribs
  )
• Delete No in-depth coverage. Fails
  SPEAK 22:01, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:07, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Most of the sources are good. Dr.KBAHT (talk) 22:37, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.