Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Block

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:11, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Block

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DELETE. Seriously, what gives with Category:Asteroid discoverers? It is chock full of non-notables who saw an asteroid or two. Just like this guy. JBsupreme (talk) 09:17, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:53, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If discovering one asteriod is what makes him notable then it is not sufficient. I haven't found any significant coverage of him as an individual in any independent reliable sources.
talk) 11:56, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per nomination. MiRroar (talk) 18:17, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails
reliable sources, Spizzilizounge, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 12:03, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete There are and have never been any references that qualify him to be notable per Wiki guidelines.SoxFan999 (talk) 22:10, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.