Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adirondack Children's Troupe

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 20:09, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adirondack Children's Troupe

Adirondack Children's Troupe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local children's theatre group that seems to be closed now (www.adirondackchildrenstroupe.org, no other contact details obviously available) and my searches found no better results than this and this. With no signs of improvement, there's nothing to suggest keeping. Notifying the only still active user and therefore presumbaly interested, Achowat. SwisterTwister talk 22:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No references, no indication of nobility. It's been a bad article since I tagged it four years ago, and it's still not worthwhile. Achowat (talk) 21:26, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:50, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.