Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Hazmat Life Support (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:45, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Advanced Hazmat Life Support

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A single short program at a single university. Way below our usual standards for notability. No significant third party sources DGG ( talk ) 05:25, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:45, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:46, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A single, specialized, three-day course offered by a single institution. No notability outside of its sphere and few mentions that are not self-produced or self-referential. Softlavender (talk) 13:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Long term promotional entry. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:47, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep but clean up. This is not a single course at a single institution - it is available in many countries. It is notable as the only course of its type in the world and is used by several medical specialties. It is similar to Basic life support, Advanced cardiac life support, Advanced trauma life support etc. GeneralBelly (talk) 17:18, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 03:40, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Entirely promotional, no indications of notability, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG.
HighKing⁺⁺ 14:08, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete' Covert promotion. Lacks independent sources both in the article and in search. –Ammarpad (talk) 14:27, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.